Faculty Profiles

Jones, A. M. (2025). Predicting the replicability of social and behavioural science claims in COVID-19 preprints. Nature Human Behaviour, 9, 287–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01961-1

Jones, A. M., & Roche, S. P. (2025). Introducing Item-Specific Formatting to Scales of Criminal Justice Attitudes: Evidence from a National Experiment. Justice Quarterly, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2025.2463414

Rossmo, K., & Jones, A. M. (2025). Group-individual probability confusion: Implications for suspect prioritization in criminal investigations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102452

Jones, A. M., & Roche, S. P. (2025). The Pragmatic American Revisited: A Direct Replication of Pickett and Baker (2014). International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 69(5), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X221133007

Brimbal, L. K. M., Jones, A. M., & Quinby, E. A. (2025). Does Telling a Story in Reverse Elicit Cues to Deceit? A Replication and Extension of Vrij, Leal, Mann, and Fisher (2012) Registered Report Stage 2. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 30, 30–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12252

Jones, A. M., & Quinby, E. A. (n.d.). Texas Attorneys Recognize Problematic Eyewitness Procedures, but Plea Away Anyway. Journal of Experimental Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-025-09668-7

Ruva, C. L., Sykes, E. C., Smith, K. D., Deaton, L. R., Erdem, S., & Jones, A. M. (2024). Battling Bias: Can Two Implicit Bias Remedies Reduce Juror Racial Bias? Psychology, Crime & Law, 30, 730–757. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2115494

Fenimore, D., & Jones, A. M. (2024). What influences punitive responses? Examining the interaction between shared identity and crime severity. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 20, 519–540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-022-09546-6

Roche, S. P., Jones, A. M., Hewitt, A. N., & Vaughan, A. D. (2024). Procedurally just policing and persons in behavioral crises: investigating public perceptions, stigma and emotion. Policing: An International Journal, 47(1), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-09-2023-0111

Jones, A. M., & Ruva, C. (2023). Implicit and Ingrained? Reducing Unconscious Bias Among Jurors. In Handbook of Evidence-Based Criminal Justice Practices. Routledge.

Jones, A. M., Wong, K. A., Meyers, C., & Ruva, C. (2022). Trial By tabloid:  Can implicit bias education reduce pretrial publicity bias? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(2), 259–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00938548211026956

Jones, A. M., Vaughan, A. D., Roche, S. P., & Hewitt, A. N. (2022). Policing persons in behavioral crises: an experimental test of bystander perceptions of procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 18(3), 581–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09462-1

Bergold, A., Jones, A. M., Dillon, M., & Penrod, S. (2021). Eyewitnesses in the courtroom: A jury-level experimental examination of the impact of the Henderson instructions. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17, 433–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09412-3

Jones, A. M., Blinkhorn, A. M., & Hawley, A. M. (2021). Sensitivity to psychologically coercive interrogations: A comparison of instructions and expert testimony to improve juror decision-making. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 21(4), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.1892438

Brimbal, L. K. M., & Jones, A. M. (2021). Does telling a story in reverse elicit cues to deceit? A replication and extension of Vrij, Leal, Mann, and Fisher (2012). Stage I manuscript. Open Science Framework.

Jones, A. M. (2021, April). Chauvin conviction: Two things to know about jury bias and two ways to reduce it. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/chauvin-conviction-2-things-to-know-about-jury-bias-and-2-ways-to-reduce-it-159330

Jones, A. M. (2020). Who do you believe? Assessing jurors’ differential perceptions of victim and bystander witnesses. Psychology, Crime & Law, 26(8), 745–767. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1733570

Jones, A. M., Bergold, A., & Penrod, S. (2020). Improving juror sensitivity to specific eyewitness factors: Judicial instructions fail the test. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27, 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1719379

Jones, A. M., & Roche, S. P. (2020). 2020 Campus Crime and Safety Survey Report.

Jones, A. M. (2020). Center for Open Science COVID-19 replication findings: SCORE Final Report.

Jones, A. M., & Roche, S. P. (2020). Center for Open Science Criminology replication findings: SCORE Final Report.

Jones, A. M., Roche, S. P., & Jones, S. E. (2020). Fall 2020 Undergraduate Student Survey.

Jones, A. M., Heuer, L., Penrod, S., & Udell, D. (2019). Perceptions of Access to Justice Among Unrepresented Tenants: An Examination of Procedural Justice and Deservingness in New York City Housing Court. Journal of Forensic Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 72–91.

Jones, A. M., Jones, S. E., & Duron, A. (2019). Perspective Differences in Trial Process: A Comparison of Judges, Juries, and Litigants. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 26, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1483274

Brimbal, L., & Jones, A. M. (2018). Perceptions of Suspect Statements: A Comparison of Exposed Lies and Confessions. Psychology, Crime and Law, 24(2), 156–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390111

Jones, A. M., & Penrod, S. (2018). Research-Based Instructions Induce Sensitivity to Confession Evidence. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25, 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2017.1364677

Jones, A. M., & Penrod, S. (2018). Improving the Effectiveness of the Henderson Instruction Safeguard against Unreliable Eyewitness Identification. Psychology, Crime and Law, 24(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390113

Jones, A. M. (2017). Female jury membership. In The Encyclopedia of Women and Crime. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

Jones, A. M., & Brimbal, L. (2017). Lay perceptions of interrogation techniques: Identifying the role of Belief in a Just World and Right Wing Authoritarianism. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 14, 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jiop.1476

Jones, A. M., Heuer, L., & Penrod, S. (2017). The responsibility of judges to assure due process: Tension among neutrality, rights protection, and role. National Science Foundation Final Report.

Jones, A. M., Bergold, A. S., Dillon, M., & Penrod, S. (2017). Comparing the effectiveness of the Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness evidence? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9279-6

Dillon, M., Jones, A. M., Bergold, A. S., Hui, C., & Penrod, S. (2017). Henderson instructions: Do they enhance evidence evaluation? Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 17, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2017.1235964

Jones, A. M., Heuer, L., & Penrod, S. (2016). The responsibility of judges to assure due process: Tension among neutrality, rights protection, and role. National Science Foundation Annual Report.

Jones, A. M., & Penrod, S. D. (2016). Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to coercive interrogation tactics? Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 16(5), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1232029

Cochran, J. K., Jones, S., Jones, A. M., & Sellers, C. S. (2016). Does criminal propensity moderate the effects of social learning theory variables on intimate partner violence? Deviant Behavior, 37(9), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1060793

Bergold, A. S., Jones, A. M., Dillion, M., & Penrod, S. (2015). Issue-specific jury instructions in eyewitness cases: Are they more effective than traditional safeguards? National Science Foundation Final Report. National Science Foundation Final Report.

Jones, A. M., & Jennings, W. G. (2015, December 28). Eyewitness testimony. In The Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment (pp. 1–5). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118519639.wbecpx263

Jones, A. M., & Kovera, M. (2015). A demonstrative helps opposing expert testimony sensitize jurors to the validity of scientific evidence. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 15, 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2015.1090225

Jones, A. M., Jones, S., & Penrod, S. (2015). Examining legal authoritarianism in the impact of punishment severity on juror decisions. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 21, 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1077244

Yarbrough, A., Jones-Brown, D., & Frazier, B. D. (2014). Eyewitness misidentification. In African Americans and Criminal Justice: An Encyclopedia (pp. 211–214). San Marcos, United States: Greenwood Publishers.

Nicholson, A. S., Yarbrough, A., Penrod, S. D., Bruinsma, G., & Weisburd, D. (2014). Jury decision making and eyewitness testimony. In Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 2727–2735). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_670

Yarbrough, A., & Nicholson, A. S. (2012). Significant eyewitness cases and the shifting focus of the courts. American Psychology and Law Society Newsletter Legal Update Column.

Jones, A. M., Jones, S., Sullivan, C., Sellers, C., & Cochran, J. (2012). Social learning and self-control:  Assessing the moderating potential of criminal propensity. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x10396041

Toomey, J., & Yarbrough, A. (2011). Studying forensic psychology in the U.S. European Association of Psychology and Law (EAPL). Retrieved from http://www.eaplstudent.com/component/content/article/121-studying-in-us

Ruva, C., Guenther, C., & Yarbrough, A. M. (2011). Positive and negative pretrial publicity: The roles of impression formation, emotion, and predecisional distortion. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811400823